the dangers of fluoride and what we can do to heal from our fluoride exposure
Fluoridation and the Environment (high resolution)
www.youtube.comThe actual science on fluoridation: its effect on salmon and the environment, efficacy for dental health, and safety for human consumption. Please watch befo...
"FLUORIDEGATE An American Tragedy" a film by Dr. David Kennedy
www.youtube.comFLUORIDEGATE An American Tragedy is a new documentary that reveals the tragedy of how government, industry and trade associations protect and promote a polic...
How Evidence based Medical Science ended Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands. (2013)
-
contained in zone: holistic healingdouble blind testing showed fluoride to be harmful and cause eczema, allergic responses and other debilitating imbalances in the body.
text of document is below (view the pdf for full formatting):
How Evidence based Medical Science ended Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands.
Declan Waugh BSc. CEnv. MCIWEM. MIEMA. MCIWM.
This is a summary of information complied from public record and published peer
reviewed journals on the history of fluoridation in the Netherlands. It explains how
medical based science resulted in the termination of fluoridation in this Country,
thanks largely to Dr. Hans Moolenburgh, a Medical Physician, Cancer Specialist and
Clinical Ecologist who along with a team of medical doctors and medical researchers
conclusively demonstrated that fluoridation of drinking water resulted in the
population being subjected to low grade poisoning by fluoride with wide ranging
medical side effects.
Hans C. Moolenburgh, M.D., graduated as a medical doctor from the University of
Leyden in 1952. He was a general practitioner in the city of Haarlem in the
Netherlands since April 1953. Apart from being a G.P., his main interests were
clinical ecology and complementary forms of cancer treatment.
Dr. Moolenbuurgh wrote three books on the subject of fluoridation. Two of these are
in Dutch: "Fluoridering van het leidingwater," 1973 and "Fluor Liever niet" in 1990.
The third book is in English: "Fluoride, the Freedom Fight," 1987. Dr. Moolenburgh
was actively involved in the campaign to end fluoridation in the Netherlands and
spent many years researching the science surrounding fluoridation.
In 1952, Dutch health authorities, following the lead of the United States, began
fluoridating the public water supply in the city of Tiel with Culemborg as the control
city.
In 1971, Dr. Moolenburgh documented the first fluoride victim in Holland during the
Haarlem hearings regarding fluoridation. The case involved a baby boy from nearby
fluoridated Velsen who had breathing troubles since birth. When the child was 6
months old, he was brought to Dr. Moolenburgh for treatment and was completely
cured in one week of its ailment simply by removing exposure to fluoride in the
drinking water.1
On March 20th, 1972, the city of Amsterdam began fluoridating its water supplies.
This had a widespread effect on surrounding communities who derived their drinking
water from the Amsterdam water suppliers, such as Heemstede, Bennebroek,
Hoofddorp, Haarlemmerliede and many others. Dr. Moolenburgh found himself in a
unique position to study the effects of fluoridation first hand, as half of his practice
lay in Heemstede (fluoridated) and the other half in Haarlem (non-fluoridated). As he
had already extensively studied the possible side-effects of fluoridated water from the
mainly American literature, Dr. Moolenburgh was on the lookout for changes in the
morbidity pattern in his practice. According to Dr. Moolenburgh it soon became
apparent that the extensive American data showing adverse effects were accurate.
“The adverse health effects began almost at once, with people, especially children,
developing colicky pains. The parents of these children often did not even know that
1
Moolenburgh H. Fluoride: the freedom fight. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing; 1987. p.
46-7.
How Evidence based Medical Science ended 2013
Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands.
their water supplies were fluoridated. These sudden changes only took place in
fluoridated Heemstede, and the cure was easy: non-fluoridated water. This cure was
shown repeatedly to be the correct one, as parents made errors with the jerrycans of
non-fluoridated water. As soon as fluoridated water was given, be it only one cup, the
sensitive children began to yell again. This was particularly stressful in babies, who
often yelled through the whole night. Other early symptoms were the small ulcers in
the mouth called stomatitis aphtosa. I also saw how children with a known allergic
condition that had been under control, such as children with atopic eczema, suddenly
saw a return of their complaints.”2
Based upon this experience in his own practice, Dr. Moolenburgh organized a group
of practitioners and researchers to study the effects of fluoridation on health. All the
doctors came from fluoridated communities and many did not believe in the existence
of the side-effects, as the health authorities had emphatically denied their existence. In
addition to the original 12 physicians practicing in Haarlem and some of its
surrounding fluoridated areas, various individuals with training in biology, chemistry,
and neurology also participated in the above study.
After un-blinded tests on skeptical General Practitioners which showed negative
health effects (similar to low-grade poisoning), to evaluate our initial findings they
conducted a double-blind experiment:
"To obtain unassailable proof that nothing but fluoride in the water was responsible
and that the ill effects were not imaginary, Dr. Moolenburgh's group turned to a
double blind procedure. A cooperating pharmacist prepared eight numbered bottles of
drinking water, some with fluoride, some without. Only the pharmacist knew which
ones contained fluoride. The numbers, placed in a sealed envelope, were sent to the
group's attorney. Patients who had recovered from side effects after changing to non-
fluoridated water drank daily, one liter of water from one of the bottles given to them.
If symptoms occurred, the number of the bottle was sent to the attorney in a sealed
envelope. Only after all the envelopes were received were they opened in the presence
of witnesses to avoid any possibility of bias. These tests proved that fluoridated water
caused the side effects we had identified, and the results have been published.3
After several months of careful study, the group began to grasp the full importance of
the problem. The difficulty at first was that each symptom in itself could be
interpreted as a normal illness. Only a combination of symptoms (e.g. colicky pains,
small ulcers and blurred vision) pointed in the true direction. The list of the most
common complaints we could readily identify with the exposure to fluoridation
includes;- Stomach and intestinal pains
- Mouth ulcers
- Excessive thirst
2 Affidavit Of Hans C. Moolenburgh, M.D. Circuit Court of Wisconsin, Fond Du Lac County,
Case No. 92 cv 579, March 1993
3 Grimbergen GW. (1974).A Double Blind Test for Determination of Intolerance to
Fluoridated Water (Preliminary Report). Fluoride 7:146-152.
How Evidence based Medical Science ended 2013
Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands.Skin irritation and eczema
Migraine-like headaches
Visual disturbances (blurred vision)
Worsening of known allergic complaints
Mental depression
Stomatitis
Joint pains
Muscular weakness, and extreme tiredness.
A definite relationship between the symptoms and fluoride in water was clearly
established."4
The clinical results observed by Dr Moolenburgh and his team confirmed the studies
undertaken by Dr. Waldbott and Dr. Petraborg and well as Dr. Feltman and Kosel
B.S., M.S, which also confirmed that fluoride in drinking water caused medical
ailments within the community 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18
According to Dr. Moolenburgh “in each of the many cases of adverse fluoride
reaction identified, changing to non-fluoridated water cured the complaints. When
4
Excerpt from Fluoride, Volume 21, No. 3, page 109-112
Waldbott GL. Chronic fluorine intoxication from drinking water. International Archives of
Allergy and Applied Immunology 7 70-74 1955.
6 Waldbott GL. Incipient fluorine intoxication from drinking water. Acta Medica
Scandinavica 156 157-168 I956.
7 Waldbott GL. Urinary fluoride and calcium excretion in persons suspected of fluoride
intolerance. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Bulletin 5 259-268 December 1957.
8 Waldbott GL. Symposium on the non-skeletal phase of chronic fluorosis. Fluoride 9 5-8
1976.
9 WaIdbott GL. Fluoride in Clinical Medicine. International. Archives of Allergy and Applied
Immunology 20 Suppl 1 1962.
10 Waldbott GL. Incipient chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water. II. Distinction
between allergic reactions and drug intolerance. International Archives of Allergy and
Applied Immunology 9:241-249 1956.
11 Waldbott GL, Cecilioni VA. "Neighborhood" fluorosis. Clinical Toxicology 2 387-396
December 1969.
12 Shea JJ, Gillespie SM, Waldbott GL. Allergy to fluoride. Annals of Allergy 25 388-391
July 1967.
13 Waldbott GL. Allergic reactions to fluoride. Journal of Asthma Research 2 51-64
September I964.
14 Waldbott GL. Tetaniform convulsions precipitated by fluoridated drinking water. Confinia
Neurologica 17 339-347 1957.
15 Waldbott GL. Urticaria due to fluoride. Acta Allergologica 13 456-468 1959.
16 Petraborg HT. Chronic fluoride intoxication from drinking water (Preliminary Report).
Fluoride 7 47-52 1974.
17 Petraborg HT. Hydrofluorosis in the fluoridated Milwaukee area. Fluoride 10 165-169
1977.
18 Feltman and Kosel, Prenatal and Postnatal ingestion of fluorides, Fourteen years of
investigation, Final Report, Journal of Dental Medicine, Vol 16. No 4, 1961
5
How Evidence based Medical Science ended 2013
Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands.
fluoridated water was returned, the complaints returned. After several months a new
and disturbing complaint was added to these: joint pains. While the other complaints
could be cured in two or three days with non-fluoridated water, the joint complaints
took several weeks to some months of non-fluoridated water to clear up.”
“Through continued study and research”, Dr. Moolenburgh observed “we now
understand that what we have been studying is not an allergy for the fluoride ion as
we had first thought, but an intoxication from the highly toxic fluorides that had been
added to the water supplies. It is well known that sensitivity to poisons can vary from
person to person, and that this variation is quite extensive. In an allergy, an increased
dose of the irritating substance will still only give symptoms, perhaps increased in
severity, in those allergic to it. In a poison, a small dose will give complaints in the
more sensitive persons. In the case of fluoride, research shows that to include about
5% of the population. With increasing doses more and more people will fall ill, and
when the dose is high enough everyone will be ill, with perhaps the most sensitive
persons already dead or dying. As a summary of our research, we are now convinced
that fluoridation of the water supplies causes a low grade intoxication of the whole
population, with only the approximately 5% most sensitive persons showing acute
symptoms. The whole population being subjected to low grade poisoning means that
their immune systems are constantly overtaxed. With all the other poisonous
influences in our environment, this can hasten health calamities. It is in the light of
this constant low grade poisoning that the substantial evidence of increased cancer
death rate due to fluoridation needs to be considered and understood.”
In conclusion, Dr. Moolenburgh stated under oath that “It is my considered scientific
opinion, and I speak in the name of my colleagues who joined in this research, that
the fluoridation of water supplies gives a significant immuno suppression of the
whole population subject to it, and is one of the important precursors of the
civilization illnesses that are rampant in modern industrialized society. It is my best
scientific judgement, made with a high degree of scientific certainty, that fluoridated
drinking water is very dangerous to the health of those who drink it.” 19
Following publication of their research results water fluoridation in Holland was
discontinued in 1976.
In a recent letter published in the journal ‘Fluoride’ Dr. Moolenburgh observed “as a
84-year-old physician with 54 years in medical practice, who also lived through the
German occupation of Holland during WW II and saw what totalitarian thinking leads
to in the end. When the fluoridating authorities finally begin to realize that
fluoridation was founded on a hill of sand, they will behave like little children when
the incoming tide demolishes their seaside sand constructions. They will shut their
eyes and protest, “No, this cannot be!” Public health authorities should only be
interested in promoting good health and preventing human suffering. Yet, from their
actions, they appear more concerned with adhering to erroneous dogmatic thinking
and maintaining their own positions and power. Discussion and debate with fluoride
19
Affidavit Of Hans C. Moolenburgh, M.D. Circuit Court of Wisconsin, Fond Du Lac
County, Case No. 92 cv 579, March 1993
How Evidence based Medical Science ended 2013
Water Fluoridation in the Netherlands.
promoters is useless and a waste of time. Just as happened in Holland and throughout
most of Europe, authorities who try to suppress unwelcome facts about fluoridation
will be eventually be swept away in response to compelling evidence and massive
public indignation.”20
It is lamentable that in 2013, as Ireland holds the presidency of the Council of the
European Union, that the Republic of Ireland, alone within Europe, continues to
support the mass medication of its population using untested industrial chemicals that
are known to cause harm to human health and the environment.
Given the considerable amount of information available there is no doubt but that the
public health authorities as well as the political establishment in Ireland (as well as in
the other few remaining countries that still support fluoridation) have utterly failed to
undertake a proper medical or scientific due diligence to protect their citizens from
unnecessary harm, that may result from supporting what can only be described as a
‘blunt totalitarian policy’ mandating the mass medication of entire populations with
untested chemicals being added to public drinking water.
Medical policy should be based on medical facts, and the facts clearly show that
fluoridation of drinking water is neither safe nor sustainable.
20
Published Letter by Dr Moolenburgh to the editor, Fluoride 43(1)81–84 January-March 2010.
The Great Culling: Our Water Official Full Movie
www.youtube.comFRAMING THE WORLD http://store.framingtheworld.com/
Fluoride whistleblower with hidden camera footage
www.youtube.comBrett Cantwell explains how to get into the water treatment industry, and how to survive with your conscience intact when you're being paid to poison people....
Dr. Dean Burk: Fluoride in Water is MURDER!
www.youtube.comA doctor who has done extensive cancer research and was formerly with the cancer institute, has concluded that fluoridating water is MURDER.
Infowars Hidden Camera - Fluoride Treatment Facility: Nightly News Report
www.youtube.comTonight's Friday, September 30 edition of the Infowars Nightly News features an in-depth special report AIRING AT 7PM CENTRAL on the turning tide of water fl...
An Inconvenient Tooth - Fluoride Documentary
www.youtube.comAn Inconvenient Tooth is a documentary film about fluoride. It was released September 6th, 2012 at the City Hall in Portland, Oregon. http://AnInconvenientTo...
10 Facts About Fluoride
www.youtube.comAttorney Michael Connett summarizes 10 basic facts about fluoride that should be considered in any discussion about whether to fluoridate water. To download ...
Purity Of Essence
www.youtube.com
Sodium Fluoride is TOXIC POISON - Footage of fluoride damaging cells and stopping reproduction
www.youtube.comPlease give a 'Thumbs up'! Learning to 'Live Free' comes from experience and personal growth ... Lets break our conditioning! http://www.livefreerevolution.c...
Shocking Government Coverups Hide Fluoride's Connection to Cancer!
www.youtube.comhttp://www.ihealthtube.com Dr. David Kennedy discusses the connection between fluoride in drinking water and cancer. He illustrates a number of studies that ...
Dr Lawrie Brett DDS Exposes Fluoride Dangers (mirror)
www.youtube.comDr Lawrie Brett describing his experences with those who fluoridate water supplies and some of the deception inherent therein. this media is for educational ...
How to eliminate Adrenal Fatigue and have a Healthy Thyroid 2013
www.youtube.comAt http://bergmanchiropractic.com and http://Owners-Guide.com we strive to educate people on natural solutions to health. http://SkypePackage.com for online ...
Michael Connett on Fluoride & IQ Studies
www.youtube.comMichael Connett of the Fluoride Action Network gives a presentation on the mounting evidence that fluoride reduces IQ in children. The IQ studies are just th...
The Fluoride Deception
vimeo.comIn this video, Christopher Bryson, an award-winning journalist and former producer at the BBC, discusses the findings of his new book The Flouride Deception. EARLY…
How to heal your thyroid and adrenals
www.youtube.comHow to heal your thyroid and adrenal glands. The thyroid and adrenals have a reciprocal relationship. When Adrenal activity is high, thyroid activity is low ...
007 POISONED HORSES
www.youtube.comThis is a unique documentary about horses poisoned by drinking water fluoridation in Pagosa Springs Colorado. Wayne and Cathy Justus show, play with, breed, ...
I Was Offered Millions To Stop Exposing Depopulation! Kevin Galalae
www.youtube.comI Was Offered Millions To Stop Exposing Depopulation, Kevin Galalae, Visit From Producer Mitch Santell http://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/2015-archives/i-wa...
fluoride (and other chemicals) finally recognised by 'peer reviewed science' as being neurotoxic poisons
- by ura soulcontained in zone: holistic healing
after many years of campaigning by those who already real-eyes-ed the toxic potential of 'fluoride' and the crime against world health that has been perpetrated by forced fluoridation of our waters - the oldest and most known 'scientific' medical journal - the lancet, has recently published a paper which documents the neurotoxic / poisonous reality of fluoride and other industrial chemicals.
despite the criminal activities of establishment hierarchies - claiming that fluoride is 'safe' and 'healthy' for decades - the denied and suppressed research was always being done and the toxic health effects of fluoride was known for decades. so this clearly amounts to a 'soft war' of suppression being waged against the majority, by the few.
toxic effects of fluoride include cellular damage to brain and neurological pathway deficiencies (equating to drops in IQ and overall loss of healthy evolution of the life form), plus direct cell death if exposure is high enough. thus the effect of fluoride is far from health giving - the effects are anti-life.
if this were not enough, the so-called 'fluoride' that is to be found in water and dental products is often not even true fluoride, since the chemical that has actually been used for many years is a toxic waste material from fertiliser and even nuclear industrial activity - which would be challenging and expensive to dispose of - if it were not being sold to so many government agencies and water processing groups to be inserted into your water and body!
despite this, even now, many are still PAYING to buy so-called 'fluoride' and not so long ago a judge in 'the area commonly known as england' 'ruled' that the people there did not have the 'right' to determine whether fluoride is added to their water or not. this raises the issue of who exactly 'owns' the water? the answer to that is in our hearts - no-one OWNS the waters, since we ARE the waters - any attempt to own, control and 'sell' the waters to each other is a direct act of denial and slavery.
for more information, links and documentaries on this topic, i invite you to view the fluoride katalist, here.
original source of the lancet paper: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422%2813%2970278-3/fulltext
comments