• light
  • dark

ideas that are integrative, revolutionary & that stimulate changes that evolve and release the limitations & suppressions which pervade society
group membership permissions:
open (public) group

who can see this group?
(show / hide) more from this group

share using

liking what we do here?

this site is advert free. your donations assist with keeping us online - click below to help us meet our technology costs


bertrand russell brand

  • 2 of 2
bertrand russell brand
    ura soul
    by ura soul

    through synchronicity of the cosmos i was presented with the idea that bertrand russell and russell brand are forms of one and the same being.

    russell brand was born 4-5 years after bertrand russell died. their two names are all but 3 characters the same.



    here's a quote from bertrand russell:

    "I believe that Communism is necessary to the world, and I believe that the heroism of Russia has fired men's hopes in a way which was essential to the realization of Communism in the future. Regarded as a splendid attempt, without which ultimate success would have been very improbable, Bolshevism deserves the gratitude and admiration of all the progressive part of mankind."

    now look again at russell brand's messages

    his videos and books speak of global socialist revolution and yet always lack the necessary depth to answer all the questions. in fact, he deliberately avoids the important answers to the key questions as if to say 'these are just too difficult for me (the one YOU are looking to for 'truth'), so we will both need to get our answers from 'more intelligent people').

    i ask you to consider deeply the content of this video that shows that russell brand is a member of the fabian society which is dedicated to lying and misrepresenting the facts in order to cause change: https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/15851/russell-brand-exposed-2-the-fabian-society-connection-and-trews-logofreemason-piedpiper

    bertrand russell was also a member of the fabian society. consider that these two beings are one and the same.

    and this is just the tip of the iceberg

    numerous websites and writers have pointed to how the public perception of bertrand russell is quite different to the reality and this is not even hidden when we read his own writings. for example, here are some quotes from the uk site 'uk column' about bertrand russell and his ideas that demonstrate the reality (source: http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/bertrand-russell-impact-science-society):

    Who was Bertrand Russell?

    According to Wikipedia, Russell was a very nice upstanding man indeed, a "British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, socialist, pacifist and social critic," no less.

    In fact, Russell was descended from an old establishment family. He was a propagandist, whose job it was to propogate certain ideas in the service of the monied elites. He was instrumental in the project to wreck European and American culture through his chairmanship of the CIA sponsored Congresss for Cultural Freedom. Far from being a pacifist, he was a promoter of the policy of Mutually Assured Destruction and was the founder of the Pugwash movement which used the spectre of Cold War nuclear annihilation to push for world government. He was a racist and promoter of population reduction. He was a Fabian socialist, and a Multhusian ideologue, along with fellow Coefficients Club member and one world government promoter H.G. Wells. He was a significant figure in the agenda to bring about what is now known as the "New World Order." He was, contrary to the Wikipedia portrayal, a thoroughly evil man.

    repeatedly bringing about tyranny under the guise of humanity

    so, just like many others on earth, it appears that this one is incarnating into different forms and repeatedly playing through the the same themes, with different overtones and characters to his role. the theme, sadly, is to portray intelligent and caring personality, while covertly using deception to bring about a tyrannical 'new world order'. if you are going to rebutt this idea, you are going to need to rebutt the factual evidence presented here and go beyond knee-jerk reactions.

    you decide!